Mass media is able to set the public agenda through increased coverage of a topic. national newspaper USA Today reported on government surveillance on its front page, 7 and The Washington Post ran a front-page article on the invasion of privacy for the first time in 2013, 16 prompting contentious discussion of the revelations among privacy experts, as well as politicians and advocates, worldwide. 5 For the first time since 2009, the U.S. Many details about PRISM and related cyberintelligence initiatives, including Tempora and XKeyScore, are still unknown by the public, 8 though news coverage following Jwas thorough and steady. The continued reporting on state surveillance by the media contrasts with the public's quickly faded interest. My results challenge the assumption that Web users would start to care more about their privacy following a major privacy incident. The worldwide public revelation of PRISM affected individuals' interest less than other breaking news concerning sports and gossip. I found no sustained growth in the user base of privacy-enhancing technologies (such as anonymizing proxies). Users' interest rose after the PRISM revelation but returned to and even fell below original levels despite continuing media coverage. I combined evidence of privacy self-protection and behaviors indicating an interest in privacy. In a longitudinal study from May 2013 to January 2014, I examined the immediate and longer-term effects on Web use in the U.S. Extensive, continuing news coverage makes this revelation a natural experiment. Snowden's exposure of PRISM in June 2013. Mass media have been reporting on global-scale state surveillance following former NSA contractor Edward J. Privacy-Enhancing Technology Post-PRISMÄespite continuing media coverage, the public's privacy behaviors have hardly changed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |